What a millimetre costs.
Six illustrative rationalisations, each shown as a plotted detail with the checking engineer's red revision cloud, and under it the clause that sets the minimum, the check that governs, and why the change is possible. The quantities are arithmetic from the stated assumptions; the money uses published Q1 2025 rates for London and New York. Savings are estimates for the engineer of record to confirm.
Flat slab, typical floor
S1- Drawn
- 250 mm
- Suggested
- 225 mm
- Assumed building
- 8 floors of 1,000 m²
- Concrete saved
- 200 m³
- Steel saved
- held equal
- London, supply
- ≈ £35,000
- New York, installed
- ≈ $210,000
- Minimum required
- EN 1992-1-2 Table 5.9: a flat slab needs 180 mm for REI 60 and 200 mm for REI 90. Nothing in EN 1992-1-1 sets a thicker minimum.
- What sets the size
- Deflection, EN 1992-1-1 7.4.2 and Table 7.4N: basic span to effective depth 17 to 24 for a flat slab, adjusted by Expressions 7.16 and 7.17 for steel stress and span.
- Why the change is possible
- At 225 mm on a 7.5 m grid the ratio is about 37 against a corrected limit that a lightly stressed slab reaches; the check is the engineer of record's, the headroom is the flag.
A thinner slab does not cut flexural steel one for one, so reinforcement is held equal.
Basement retaining wall
W3- Drawn
- 400 mm, ρ 0.6%
- Suggested
- 300 mm
- Assumed building
- 110 m perimeter, 3.5 m high
- Concrete saved
- 38 m³
- Steel saved
- 1.8 t
- London, supply
- ≈ £10,000
- New York, installed
- ≈ $54,000
- Minimum required
- ACI 318-19 Table 11.3.1.1: exterior basement and foundation walls at least 190 mm (7.5 in). EN 1992-1-1 9.6.2: vertical reinforcement at least 0.002 Ac.
- What sets the size
- Bending and shear from the retained soil, EN 1992-1-1 6.1 and 6.2 (or ACI 318-19 Chapter 22), with the earth pressure from EN 1997-1 9.5.
- Why the change is possible
- A 300 mm wall sits well above both minima; at 400 mm with ρ 0.6% the section carries three times the minimum steel and a third more concrete than the retained height asks for.
Columns, ground to L6
C7- Drawn
- 500 × 500, ρ 2%
- Suggested
- 450 × 450
- Assumed building
- 40 columns, 6 storeys of 3.3 m
- Concrete saved
- 38 m³
- Steel saved
- 5.9 t
- London, supply
- ≈ £17,000
- New York, installed
- ≈ $84,000
- Minimum required
- EN 1992-1-1 9.5.2: column steel at least 0.10 NEd/fyd and not less than 0.002 Ac; ACI 318-19 10.6.1.1: 1% of Ag. Fire, EN 1992-1-2 Table 5.2a: R60 from 200 mm at low load level.
- What sets the size
- Axial load with bending, EN 1992-1-1 6.1, and slenderness, 5.8.3 (or ACI 318-19 Chapter 22 and 6.2.5).
- Why the change is possible
- The same 2% steel in a 450 mm section still meets the minima; whether the axial check passes at C35/45 is the engineer's call, and it is where the flag points.
Dropping the class from C40/50 to C35/45 would add to this; it is not priced here.
Floor beams
B12- Drawn
- 300 × 600
- Suggested
- 300 × 500
- Assumed building
- 60 beams of 7.5 m, 300 kg/m³
- Concrete saved
- 14 m³
- Steel saved
- 4.1 t
- London, supply
- ≈ £9,700
- New York, installed
- ≈ $45,000
- Minimum required
- EN 1992-1-1 9.2.1.1: tension steel at least 0.26 fctm/fyk bt d and not less than 0.0013 bt d. ACI 318-19 Table 9.3.1.1: depth at least span/18.5 for a beam continuous at one end, about 405 mm here.
- What sets the size
- Deflection, EN 1992-1-1 7.4.2 and Table 7.4N: basic span to depth 18 to 26 for an end span (K = 1.3), then bending 6.1 and shear 6.2.
- Why the change is possible
- A 500 mm deep beam over 7.5 m gives a span to effective depth ratio of about 17, inside the basic table before any correction; the 600 mm section was rationalised, not calculated.
Pad footings
F2- Drawn
- 2.4 × 2.4 × 0.7 m
- Suggested
- 2.2 × 2.2 × 0.7 m
- Assumed building
- 30 pads, 80 kg/m³
- Concrete saved
- 19 m³
- Steel saved
- 1.5 t
- London, supply
- ≈ £6,000
- New York, installed
- ≈ $31,000
- Minimum required
- ACI 318-19 13.3.1.2: at least 150 mm (6 in) of depth above the bottom reinforcement for a footing on soil. EN 1992-1-1 9.8.2 and 9.3.1.1: minimum reinforcement as for slabs.
- What sets the size
- Bearing resistance from unfactored loads, EN 1997-1 6.5.2 (or ACI 318-19 13.3.1.1), then punching and bending in the pad.
- Why the change is possible
- The pad is sized by allowable bearing pressure; where the geotechnical report carries margin, the 2.2 m pad meets the same bearing check with the same 0.7 m thickness.
Steel floor beams, lightest code-compliant section
SB- Drawn
- as scheduled
- Suggested
- lightest compliant section
- Assumed building
- 5,000 m² office at 90 kg/m², beams 60% of the frame
- Concrete saved
- —
- Steel saved
- 72 t
- London, supply
- ≈ £250,000 of steel; ≈ £70,000 to £85,000 of frame cost
- New York, installed
- ≈ $760,000
- Minimum required
- EN 1993-1-1 6.2.5: bending resistance of the cross-section; 6.3.2: lateral-torsional buckling where the compression flange is unrestrained.
- What sets the size
- Deflection and vibration under EN 1990 A1.4 with the National Annex limits (span/360 for beams carrying brittle finishes in the UK NA to EN 1993-1-1, 7.2).
- Why the change is possible
- The lightest section that passes both checks is the code-compliant one. Across 3,500 floor beams in 30 UK buildings that section was 26.5% lighter than the one scheduled.
Material is 30 to 40% of a steel frame cost; fabrication and erection do not fall with tonnage, so the frame figure is the honest one. The 26.5% comes from 3,500 floor beams in 30 UK buildings (Drewniok, Campbell and Orr, 2020).
Illustrative. London at Q1 2025 material rates: concrete 30 MPa £175/m³, 16 mm rebar £1,800/t, universal beams £3,500/t. New York at Q1 2025 installed rates: concrete in slab $1,046/m³, reinforcement in beams $7,500/t, steel beams $10,500/t (Turner & Townsend, Global Construction Market Intelligence 2025). Formwork, cranage, programme and the knock-on to columns and foundations are not counted. Steel at 7.85 t/m³. Do not add the six together; they are separate buildings.
The scan finds the candidates in your set.
It flags the elements with headroom against code minimums and typical practice. The full report puts m³, tonnes and cost impact on each one, with the sheet and section mark to go to.